Woman: The Eve Of All Mankind.

Imagine time as a river. It flows steadily onward, carrying us with it. We can see its effects on our bodies, our loved ones, and the world around us, but we can’t quite bottle it up or hold onto it. Our cells tirelessly copy themselves, trying to keep us looking our best, but even that valiant effort can’t stop the relentless flow of time. In the grand scheme, it always wins.

So, how did we even get here? You could get the usual spiel about the Big Bang, a cosmic whoopie cushion that birthed our universe. But frankly, that’s just the beginning of the story. We’re more interested in what happened after the party poppers went off, the planets formed, and, for dramatic effect, let’s assume the T-Rexes are extinct (sorry, little-big fellas).

Picture a young Earth, bursting with life. Plants of all shapes and sizes stretched towards the sun, while a dazzling array of animals scurried, swam, and soared. Here’s the thing about nature: it’s a champion at giving everyone the tools they need to survive. It’s like a cosmic personal trainer, constantly tweaking and evolving lifeforms to create a balanced ecosystem, a harmonious dance of predator and prey. Survival of the fittest, you might say. Basically, it all boils down to eating, avoiding becoming someone else’s lunch, and, well, you know, making more of yourself; procreation.

Now that we’ve got that groundwork laid, let’s get to the real reason you’re here: the question that’s been pondered for ages. The answer, like many things in life, is a little more complex than a simple yes or no. Traditionally, some folks might point to religious texts and say that Adam, the OG man, came first. After all, it does say “God created Man in his image,” and there’s a common assumption that God is, well, probably a dude. But here’s a thought: the folks who wrote those religious texts? All men. Maybe there’s a bit of bias there, wouldn’t you say? The question of whether women or men came first has captivated storytellers and scientists for millennia. Genesis presents Eve from Adam’s rib, while some Aboriginal Australian creation myths depict the primordial being as female.

Alright, folks, before the righteous rage commences, let’s just have a curious conversation. No holy wars here, just a simple question: why are there no female authors in the Bible? Maybe the book of Ruth? Or maybe it has something to do with the whole “women being suppressed” thing throughout history, right? Like, they weren’t given the platform to shine because, well, men.

Science offers a more nuanced perspective, challenging the notion of a single, definitive first sex. I know single-celled organisms to multicellular organisms is a complex evolutionary dance, so let’s skip that biology lecture. We’re here to settle the age-old debate: who came first, man or woman?

By now, some of you might be rolling your eyes, thinking, “This guy’s got some serious theories or big balls”, I am guilty and I often juggle between both.! But hey, hear me out! Respectful debate is the spice of life, right? Besides, I welcome any and all insights (except maybe involving angry mobs with torches).

Here’s the thing: science tells a fascinating story about our chromosomes, XX for women and XY for men. And guess what? The X chromosome is older than the Y, evolutionarily speaking. Think of it as the cool grandma of the bunch.

The X chromosome chilled out as a regular chromosome for a long time, but the Y chromosome? That young whippersnapper is a late bloomer, pieced together from other chromosomes and slowly acquiring its “manly” traits.

This little scientific tidbit, discovered by the awesome biologist Nettie Stevens (major props to you, lady!), makes you wonder, right? The X is older, just like Eve comes before Adam (you read it right), and even the alphabet puts X before Y. Coincidence? Maybe!

But here’s the real kicker: nature’s all about balance, giving everyone the tools they need to survive. Imagine a scenario with way more women than men. Biologically, that’s kind of a win. Why?

• Baby Boom: More women mean more potential offspring, especially with a limited number of dads. Boom! Population increases.
• Diversity is Key: Multiple women bring different genetic backgrounds to the table, making the whole group more adaptable and less likely to get wiped out by some nasty disease.
• Backups Matter: If something unfortunate happens to the fellas (hunting accident, meteor strike, you name it), the ladies can still keep the population going. Redundancy is a beautiful thing.
• Nature’s Preference: Turns out, polygynous mating systems (one dude with multiple ladies) are more common than polyandrous ones (one lady with multiple dudes). So, biology might be hinting at something here.

Now, this doesn’t definitively prove women came first, but it does make you think, doesn’t it? If nature was to put us in the position to thrive and survive, then mathematically our best chance of repopulating the earth is having more women than men. Producing eggs is generally a more energy-intensive process compared to sperm production. In an environment with limited resources, a larger female population could ensure a higher number of offspring with a greater chance of survival.

In many species, females invest significantly more energy in parental care, from nurturing eggs to raising young. A larger female population could facilitate better offspring care, leading to higher survival rates.

Early humans undoubtedly interacted with animals in complex ways. Communication likely played a crucial role in their survival. They might have observed animal behavior, interpreted tracks, and used vocalizations or gestures to coordinate hunts, track prey, and avoid danger. This interprets the gender that came first is more likely to be the first to communicate with animals.

The story of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden offers an interesting parallel. Here, Eve interacts with the serpent, suggesting a form of communication between humans and animals. However, it’s important to remember the story’s symbolic nature.

Instead of a literal conversation, the serpent might represent a deeper understanding of the natural world, perhaps a woman’s (Eve’s) intuition honed through observation and experience. Perhaps Eve, through this “communication,” learned to distinguish edible from poisonous fruits.

In many cultures, women have traditionally held a deep connection with nature and its inhabitants. This connection could have led them to develop a more nuanced understanding of animal behavior and communication.

Throughout history, women have faced a constant struggle for equality. This lack of agency and societal limitations heavily influenced the rise of prostitution. For most of history, women lacked property rights and access to education or skilled professions. They were financially dependent on fathers or husbands, leaving them vulnerable. Without options, some women turned to prostitution for basic survival. Men were often free to engage in sexual activity outside of marriage, while women faced harsh punishments for any transgression. This double standard created a market for paid sex, where women bore the social stigma.

The issue of who came first, man or woman, remains a fascinating topic. While the lingering presence of gender inequality in the 21st century (as evidenced by the wage gap) doesn’t directly answer this question, it does offer a compelling backdrop.

Consider this: if women still face struggles for equality today, then their position in earlier centuries would have undoubtedly been worse. This historical suppression could explain why potential evidence of women’s earlier existence might have been conveniently overlooked or even deliberately suppressed – perhaps by the dominant male power structures of the time.

Looking beyond the wage gap, cultural, social, and even biological factors suggest a possible primacy for women.

Culturally: Many societies have traditionally held women in positions closer to nature and possessed of a deeper understanding of the natural world. This connection could have led to a more intuitive and perhaps earlier grasp of survival skills crucial in our evolutionary past.

Socially: The historical burden of childbirth and child-rearing might have instilled in women a strong sense of community and cooperation, skills essential for early human survival.

Biologically: Scientific evidence suggests the X chromosome, associated with females, predates the Y chromosome, associated with males. This doesn’t definitively prove women came first, but it adds another layer of intrigue.

Mathematically: 5 men 1 woman, possibly 1 offspring a year. Now 5 women and 1 man, will have more than 1 offspring yearly. While the debate continues, I firmly believe women, not just a single woman, predate the existence of men.

From the dawn of humanity to the stars, the story of women is a testament to resilience, innovation, and the power to shape our world. Ignoring half the equation hinders progress. Inclusion, not exclusion, is the fuel that propels us forward. Let’s teach history, its validity is essential to understanding why we are here, who we are and where we should be headed. It’s not about tearing men down, but about building a future where all of humanity can soar. You can say “Jason, you are just a feminist” and you will be right. Yes, I am……………..UNAPOLOGETICALLY.